Introduction to Fault‑Managed Power
Expert Insights
EMC Concepts Explained
Hot Topics in ESD
Introduction to Fault‑Managed Power
Expert Insights
EMC Concepts Explained
Hot Topics in ESD
ISSN 1948-8254 (print)
ISSN 1948-8262 (online)
is published by
Same Page Publishing Inc.
451 King Street, #458
Littleton, MA 01460
tel: (978) 486-4684
fax: (978) 486-4691
© Copyright 2026 Same Page Publishing, Inc. all rights reserved
Contents may not be reproduced in any form without the prior consent of the publisher. While every attempt is made to provide accurate information, neither the publisher nor the authors accept any liability for errors or omissions.
editor-in-chief
Please contact our circulation department at circulation@incompliancemag.com
Detailed in a Final Report and Order issued in late March, the new rules will:
- Eliminate filing requirements related to network change disclosure requirements;
- Overhaul and streamline rules applicable to technology transition discontinuance applications…
According to an article posted to the website of Astronomy.com, most of the 1300-pound probe burned up upon reentry over the eastern Pacific Ocean early in March. However, the probe’s twin, Van Allen Probe B, is still in orbit and is expected to reenter the Earth’s atmosphere by 2030.
The Van Allen probes were launched in August 2012 in an effort to further our understanding of the radiation environment…
n our increasingly electronic world, electromagnetic interference (EMI) poses a significant challenge to the reliability and performance of electronic devices. Shielding is a critical technique used in electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) to mitigate the effects of EMI. This article explores the concept of shielding, its importance in EMC, various shielding materials and their applications, and practical tips for designing effective shielding solutions.
n the commercial world, EMI testing includes emissions testing and what is termed “immunity” testing. As an example, for radiated immunity, the test requirement is performed at a given level, usually 3 V/m or 10 V/m for most devices. If the equipment to be tested becomes upset or responds in any way to the radiated field, the equipment has failed the test.1 The only options are redesigning the equipment or claiming a lower category for the standard. There is no relaxation or allowance for not meeting the test level.
In the case of military and aerospace testing, the tests are called “susceptibility” and not immunity tests. They tend to be performed to a much higher level than commercial tests, and over a wider frequency range. Most test levels vary over frequency. In the case of DO-160, the test levels for radiated susceptibility may be much higher at higher frequencies than at lower frequencies. One example is Category R, which is run at a maximum of 20 V/m from 100-400 MHz but requires pulse modulation testing of 150 V/m at 400 MHz and higher.
here’s an old joke in engineering that standards are written by people who’ve already survived the problem. After decades working in automotive EMC, I’d add another line: the best standards are written by people who were willing to get on airplanes.
My career has unfolded alongside the evolution of international automotive EMC standards—CISPR 25, ISO 11452, SAE J1113, and UNECE Regulation No. 10. I’ve watched them grow thicker, more detailed, and more globally influential. What hasn’t changed is how real progress happens: people gathered in a room, working out difficult technical tradeoffs face-to-face.
here comes a moment (typically far too late in the process) when someone in product development asks, “We can get this certified by launch… right?”
The room gets quiet.
Engineering looks at Quality. Quality looks at Regulatory (and in small businesses around the world, each of those teams amounts to just one person). Regulatory starts calculating how many pages are in the standard and how many nights of sleep remain before the ship date.
he world is changing. The unprecedented number of accidents and product recalls in recent years and subsequent low consumer recall compliance raise questions about the role that various factors (i.e., education, regulations, etc.) play in ensuring safer products. The increase in quantity and complexity of products also leads to an increase in potential hazards, which can endanger the safety of people or properties, even when those products are installed, maintained, and used for their intended purpose.
In this article, we present an argument for how effective engineering education can increase the impact of professionals involved in safety compliance. Our reasoning should help guide the academic engineering community and make a compelling case for greater resource allocation in educational programs and initiatives to improve compliance for safer products.
his is the third and final article in the series investigating the effectiveness of decoupling capacitors while varying the topology of vias, trace length between the decoupling capacitor and the IC power/ground pins, and distance from the internal power-ground plane pair. The first article [1] introduced the electrical schematic, via and trace topologies, as well as PCB topology. The second article [2] addressed the impact of the distance of the capacitor from the IC VCC and GND pins on the conducted emissions. This article investigates the impact of conducted emissions due to the distance of the capacitor from the internal power-ground plane pair and the impact of the capacitor via topology. The conducted emissions are measured using the CISPR25 standard, as shown in the second article [2] in the series.
n electrostatic discharge (ESD) flooring system is a critical component in environments where static electricity can damage sensitive electronics, disrupt operations, or create safety risks. From electronics manufacturing and data centers to healthcare labs and aerospace facilities, ESD flooring plays a foundational role in static control programs.
The term “flooring systems” ensures the end-user understands that several components create the complete path to ground. For example, with a glue-down vinyl tile, the flooring system would include the vinyl tile itself, the adhesive used to secure the tile and provide a connection to ground, the substrate it is adhered to, any finish applied to the tile, and the grounding connection. Any faulty element of this system, such as using a regular (insulative) adhesive, would cause the system to fail.

You can do that here.




















