In Compliance: The Compliance Information Resource for Electrical Engineers logo
Respectfully Revisiting the 1967 US Navy
USS Forrestal Carrier Disaster
Was it the Radar? Part 2
Including
Achieving and Sustaining Medical Device Compliance

Filter Designs for Switched Power Converters: Part 2

Expert Insights

EMC Concepts Explained

Hot Topics in ESD

An aircraft carrier deck with military jets and a control tower at sunset.
Including
Achieving and Sustaining Medical Device Compliance

Filter Designs for Switched Power Converters: Part 2

Expert Insights

EMC Concepts Explained

Hot Topics in ESD

April 2025
Ametek Compliance Test Solutions
rethinking
solid-state amplifiers
Military personnel in camouflage using a radio at sunset.
A fighter jet flying over an aircraft carrier at sea.
Large antenna system with grid panels against a blue sky.
A man adjusts a large drone on a table in a workshop.
Communication towers with antennas against a blue sky with clouds.
singular solid state amplifiers
Think you know the application limits of a solid-state amplifier?
THINK AGAIN!
When it comes to pushing the boundaries of technology and ensuring the reliability of electronic systems, high power solid state amplifiers play a pivotal role in a growing number Aerospace & Defense applications:

  • HIRF (High-Intensity Radiated Field) Testing
  • NEMP (Nuclear Electromagnetic Pulse) Testing
  • EW (Electronic Warfare) Jamming and Jamming Simulation
  • Component Testing
  • EW (Electronic Warfare) Destruction
  • Radar and radar simulation
Visit us at www.arworld.us
Contact us at ari-sales@ametek.com or telephone 215.723.8181
The Power of 3: Emtest / Teseq / AR logos
Ar Ametek logo
The EERC logo
Electrical Engineering Resource Center
Navigate the dangerous world of high‑voltage testing with precision instruments that prevent catastrophic failures—where accurate calibration means the difference between reliable operation and deadly flashover.
Unlock hidden structures with ultrasonic visualization powered by advanced PC digitizers—where 70 MHz sound waves and streaming gigabytes of data reveal what microscopes can’t see beneath tissue surfaces.
Unlock field testing potential with this rugged, dual-channel signal generator that simulates everything from jet engine rotations to piezoelectric sensors—all in a two-pound, battery-powered package.
Harness peak RF system performance by measuring what matters: antenna patterns, gain, and bandwidth with VNA precision—turning environmental challenges into design opportunities that deliver results.
In Compliance logo
In Compliance Magazine
ISSN 1948-8254 (print)
ISSN 1948-8262 (online)
is published by

Same Page Publishing Inc.
451 King Street, #458
Littleton, MA 01460
tel: (978) 486-4684
fax: (978) 486-4691

© Copyright 2025 Same Page Publishing, Inc. all rights reserved

Contents may not be reproduced in any form without the prior consent of the publisher. While every attempt is made to provide accurate information, neither the publisher nor the authors accept any liability for errors or omissions.

publisher/
editor-in-chief
Lorie Nichols
lorie.nichols@incompliancemag.com
(978) 873-7777
business development director
Sharon Smith
sharon.smith@incompliancemag.com
(978) 873-7722
production director
Erin C. Feeney
erin.feeney@incompliancemag.com
(978) 873-7756
marketing director
Ashleigh O’Connor
ashleigh.oconnor@incompliancemag.com
(978) 873-7788
circulation director
Alexis Evangelous
alexis.evangelous@incompliancemag.com
(978) 486-4684
features editor
William von Achen
bill.vonachen@incompliancemag.com
(978) 486-4684
senior contributors
Bogdan Adamczyk
Keith Armstrong
Ken Javor
Kenneth Ross
Christopher Semanson
Min Zhang
columns contributors
Bogdan Adamczyk
Erin Earley
Min Zhang
EOS/ESD Association, Inc.
advertising
For information about advertising, contact Sharon Smith at sharon.smith@incompliancemag.com.
subscriptions
In Compliance Magazine subscriptions are free to qualified subscribers in North America. Subscriptions outside North America are $149 for 12 issues. The digital edition is free.

Please contact our circulation department at circulation@incompliancemag.com

April 2025
Volume 17 l Number 4
Contents
Feature Articles
Was it the Radar?

Respectfully Revisiting the 1967 US Navy USS Forrestal Carrier Disaster, Part 2
By Brian M. Kent, Ph.D.
By Nicole Small, Michael Kipping, and James Pink
Columns
By Bogdan Adamczyk, Patrick Cribbins, and Khalil Chame
By Iad Mirshad and Ed Oldynski for EOS/ESD Association, Inc.
Departments
compliance news
Companies Seek Waiver of Rules for UWB Systems
Tesla and two additional technology companies are seeking waivers of current U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations to obtain equipment authorization to use advanced ultra‑wideband (UWB) technologies in their respective products.

According to a Public Notice issued by the Commission, Tesla is seeking a waiver of current UWB restrictions to implement a UWB optimal positioning system that would operate in the 7.5‑8.5 GHz frequency range to facilitate the wireless charging of its electric vehicles…

EU Commission Issues Infringement Decision on Failure to Transpose EU RoHS
The Commission of the European Union (EU) has stepped up its efforts to ensure that Member States implement the provisions of the EU Directive on hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment.

According to a press release, the Commission has issued infringement decisions to 27 individual Member States for failure to notify the Commission of their transposition efforts related to 11 different EU directives. The notices cover directives addressing the reporting of air pollutant…

Thank you to our Premium Digital Partners
A.H. Systems logo
Advanced Test Equipment Rentals logo
CSA Group logo
NSI MI Ametek logo
MFG Tray logo
Siglent logo
Würth Elektronik logo
expert insights
EMC Bench Notes
Troubleshooting with a Nearby Antenna
By Kenneth Wyatt
O

ver the last several months, we showed how to use near-field probes to characterize and interpret dominant harmonic energy sources on PC boards and how to use RF current probes to characterize the coupling of these energy sources to power and I/O cables. This time, we’ll discuss how to use a nearby antenna to monitor actual emissions from a product or system.

While many designers attempt to perform radiated emissions troubleshooting at an outdoor site or in a semi-anechoic chamber using a third-party test lab facility, I’ve found a much more efficient method is to perform this using a nearby antenna right on your own work bench (Figure 1). Performing this testing in‑house also allows additional tools and resources to be close at hand.

Best of all, a calibrated EMI antenna is not really required, as all we care about are relative changes! In one case, I was testing an industrial printer and connected a 1m-long piece of wire to the spectrum analyzer and stretched it out nearby. I’ve even had clients use a nearby Wi-Fi antenna for troubleshooting. So long as you can see the harmonic emissions, you can try various mitigations and observe the results in real time!

expert insights
Military and EMC Aerospace
Grounds and Returns
By Patrick André
L

ooking back at the 2024 IEEE International Symposium on EMC, the one concept that is still ringing in my ears is what is often called “ground” but is actually a power or signal return or reference plane. The reason is that what is commonly called “ground” and what is a power or signal return, or that of a reference plane, is not the same. There were several talks on this concept given by many people who are much brighter than I am and have proven to me they know what they are talking about. And yet, I recently read an article whose author seemed confused about what a ground was.

The concept of electrical “ground” has its basis in the “earth-return telegraph” and the first telephone connections. Signal lines were routed between two points, but the return path used was the ground, literally the earth. The earth is also used for electrical safety return paths, neutral reference, and split phase power reference. In the United States, the electrical power panel in the home or commercial locations (when correctly installed) have the neutral lines and safety grounds tied to a common bus bar, which should be routed to a ground rod near the power panel.

Feature Article
Was it the Radar?
Respectfully Revisiting the 1967 US Navy USS Forrestal Carrier Disaster
Part 2
Re-examining the Historical Records to Reaffirm the Disaster’s Root Causes
By Brian M. Kent, Ph.D.
old black and white photos of USS Forrestal water base
Dedication
This article is humbly dedicated to the families, relatives, and friends of the 134 Sailors killed and 167 severely wounded on July 29, 1967 aboard the USS Forrestal. We honor the hundreds of additional survivors who suffered from a lifetime of PTSD and “survivor’s guilt.” The bravery and heroics of the Sailors who saved the USS Forrestal and its 5,400 lives by quenching the fire and preventing the carrier from capsizing cannot possibly be overstated.
I

n 1967, while on patrol in the Gulf of Tonkin, the United States Navy Carrier USS Forrestal was executing wartime missions over North Vietnam. At 10:45 am local time, the ship was preparing to launch more than 27 A-4 Skyhawk and F-4B Phantom Fighter jets, all fully fueled and armed with a mixture of iron bombs, precision missiles, and Zuni rocket launchers. At 10:51 am, an F-4B experienced an un-commanded Zuni missile launch on the flight deck, striking a neighboring A-4 and starting a fire, causing a series of devastating secondary explosions. Quenching the fire nearly capsizes the ship, which is ultimately saved through the heroics of the sailors who served aboard the Forrestal.

Feature Article
Achieving and Sustaining Medical Device Compliance
A Product Life-Cycle Compliance Model
By Nicole Small, Michael Kipping, and James Pink
various lines with circular connection points and arrows create a large upward arrow
T

he journey of bringing a new medical device to market is littered with potential pitfalls and obstacles that need to be overcome. A common challenge facing innovators is how to navigate regulatory pathways. Typically, this is a topic that is low on people’s to-do lists.

Irrespective of the regulatory pathway that applies to your product, you will have to demonstrate that your product has valid scientific evidence of adequate safety, performance, and efficacy throughout its product lifecycle. Failure to provide this information is a common reason for delays and rejection of regulatory documentation by regulators such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and conformity assessment bodies such as EU Notified Bodies. This often leads to increasing costs and failure to obtain market access of a device that may have a positive health outcome and better safety profile.

Therefore, taking time to evaluate regulatory pathways early in the development of a product will mean that you understand evidence requirements and minimize the likelihood of issues during regulatory approval processes. It will also mean that you have a better understanding of regulatory costs and timelines.

Once a positive regulatory decision has been made and your device is on the market, that is not the end of the journey. No medical device is infallible. So, plan to expect issues to arise. Each year, regulators such as the FDA and the United Kingdom’s Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) receive thousands of adverse incident reports about medical devices each year. The harm or potential to cause harm to patients and users caused by device or manufacturing failure, user error, or new unidentified hazard can result in recalls, changes in design, further validation and verification, and reputational risk.

A product life cycle approach, underpinned by a proactive and reactive regulatory and compliance strategy, helps to ensure that you consider all of the key steps, from first having your idea to placing a medical device on the market and then maintaining that market access.

Feature Article
Filter Designs for Switched Power Converters: Part 2
Every Noisy Component You Need to Know in a Switched-Mode Power Supply
By Dr. Min Zhang
digital illustration of a side profile of various heads with scribbles running through them and a lightbulb on the last one
I

n Part 1 of this series of articles1, we provide an overview of EMI filter design for switch-mode power supplies (SMPS). In this part, we will examine specific aspects of switched power converters. The goal is to help readers understand:

  1. Emission spectrum of an SMPS
  2. Noise sources in a typical SMPS
  3. Coupling mechanisms of noise in an SMPS
  1. Grounding considerations in switched-mode power supplies and
  2. Input and output capacitors
Some readers may notice that this discussion does not directly address filters. However, years of experience in the field have shown that a deep understanding of these topics is essential to truly solving EMI issues. While filters are required for most switched-mode converters, failing to address points 1–5 makes designing an effective filter strategy inefficient, if not impossible. In this article, we will focus on the converter itself, with special emphasis on grounding, input, and output capacitors, as these often determine whether a filter will be effective.
EMC concepts explained
Inductor Impedance Evaluation from S-Parameter Measurements
Part 1: S11 One-Port Shunt, Two-Port Shunt, and Two-Port Series Methods
By Bogdan Adamczyk, Patrick Cribbins, and Khalil Chame
T

his is the first of two articles devoted to the topic of inductor impedance evaluation from the S parameter measurements (capacitor impedance evaluation from the S parameter measurements was described in [1] and [2]). This article describes the impedance measurements and calculations from the S11 parameter using the one‑port shunt method, two-port shunt, and two‑port series methods. The next article will discuss impedance measurements and calculations using S21 parameters with two‑port shunt and two‑port series methods.

One-Port Shunt Method
One-port shunt configuration is shown in Figure 1.
Diagram of a one-port shunt configuration
Figure 1: One-port shunt configuration
For this configuration, the inductor’s impedance in terms of the S11 parameter was derived in [1] as
equation 1
More Than a Magazine:
In Compliance April 2025 cover; illustration of people reading a magazine
Your Complete Compliance Resource
Get more from In Compliance Magazine, beyond the pages! Explore our suite of digital resources designed to keep you informed and ahead of the curve:
Digital Magazine
Read every issue online.
Breaking News & Insights
Stay ahead with expert blogs.
Complete Archive
Access past issues anytime.
Online Directory
Find industry leaders and services.
Resource Center
White papers, guides & more.
Weekly Newsletter
Delivered straight to your inbox.
illustration of a person using a computer
Visit us online to explore and manage your subscription today!
hot topics in ESD

AC and DC Ionization, the Whole Story

By Iad Mirshad and Ed Oldynski for EOS/ESD Association, Inc.
P

lacing a target too close to an ionizer, whether AC or DC, may increase the risk of negative effects, such as localized charge buildup, electrical stress, or minor material degradation. To prevent adverse effects and potential damage, maintain an appropriate distance from the ionizer. While AC ionizers can generate higher electric fields than DC ionizers, their impact on the target must be considered in the context of the target’s impedance, size, and the ionizer’s operational frequencies. When these factors are accounted for, the potential risks posed by AC ionization to the target are not significantly greater.

Test Setup
The experimental setup consisted of two ionizers, Model 5645 MP (AC) and Model 5225 (DC) ionizing bars, suspended above a perforated table, as shown in Figure 1.

The test sample in Figure 2a was designed to simulate the exposure of targeted devices and structures of various sizes. The experiment used four pads: a 1.0‑inch square, a 0.5-inch square, a 0.25-inch square, and a 0.018 x 0.057-inch rectangle. Each pad was connected to a Lecroy WaveSurfer 64Xs oscilloscope using a 10 MW (9.5 pF) probe. A Faraday Cage was used to shield the probes from the electric field and minimize measurement contamination.

Is it time to renew your subscription to In Compliance?
Was this issue of In Compliance forwarded to you?
Do you only want to receive the In Compliance enewsletters?

You can do that here.

Upcoming Events
red star Visit In Compliance’s booth at these events!
Always check an event’s website for current details.
April 1-3
TCB Council Spring Workshop

April 6-8
EMCH2025 International Conference on Electromagnetic Compatibility

April 6-9
A2LA Annual Conference 2025

April 7-9
The Battery Show Middle East 2025

April 24
Cyber Security and The Cyber Resiliency Act

April 24-25
Principles of Electromagnetic Compatibility

April 28-May 2
EMA Expo

May 6
red star 2025 Chicago IEEE EMC Mini Symposium

May 8
red star EMC Fest 2025

May 12-16
2025 International ESD Workshop (IEW‑Europe)

May 13-15
red star 2025 IEEE International Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering (ISPCE)

May 18-21
2025 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society (ACES) Symposium

May 19-21
EMC & Compliance International Exhibition & Workshops

May 19-22
2025 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference

May 19-23
2025 Asia-Pacific International Symposium and Exhibition on Electromagnetic Compatibility (APEMC)

May 20
red star AMTA 2025 Regional Meeting

June 3-6
WPTCE 2025IEEE Wireless Power Technology Conference and Expo

June 15-20
red star IMS 2025 – IEEE International Microwave Symposium

June 26
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification for Federal Government Procurements

In Compliance: The Compliance information Resource for Electrical Engineers logo
Thanks for reading our April 2025 issue!